Trend Report

Seattle Times and Newsday Sue OpenAI and Microsoft: The AI Copyright Showdown

Updated September 7, 2026

The Seattle Times and Newsday have filed separate lawsuits against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the unauthorized use of their articles in training AI models like ChatGPT. These legal battles highlight the growing tension between AI developers and content creators over fair use and licensing. As AI copyright law evolves, these cases could reshape how AI companies access and use copyrighted material.

Key takeaways

  • Seattle Times and Newsday have filed separate lawsuits against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement in AI training.
  • The lawsuits challenge the 'fair use' defense, arguing that AI training is commercial and not transformative.
  • These cases follow similar lawsuits by The New York Times and authors, signaling a broader industry pushback.
  • Outcomes could lead to licensing agreements or set precedents that impact AI development and journalism.
  • Content creators can take proactive steps to protect their work from unauthorized AI scraping.

Why Are Seattle Times and Newsday Suing OpenAI and Microsoft?

The Seattle Times and Newsday have taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming that these tech giants used their copyrighted articles without permission or compensation to train AI models, including ChatGPT. The lawsuits argue that the AI systems were trained on vast amounts of text scraped from the internet, which included the publishers' content, and that this constitutes copyright infringement.

The publishers assert that OpenAI and Microsoft profited from their work without providing fair compensation, undermining the journalism industry. This legal move is part of a broader trend where news organizations are fighting back against AI companies that use their content to build powerful tools without licensing agreements.

The Legal Basis: Copyright Infringement and Fair Use

At the heart of these lawsuits is the question of whether training AI on copyrighted material falls under 'fair use' or constitutes infringement. Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. However, the publishers argue that AI training is not transformative but rather a commercial use that directly competes with their own content.

The lawsuits allege that OpenAI and Microsoft copied entire articles to build datasets, which were then used to generate responses that can mimic or summarize the original content. This, they claim, goes beyond fair use because it exploits the publishers' investment in journalism without a license.

Comparison with Previous Lawsuits

These lawsuits are not isolated. They follow similar actions by other media outlets and authors. For instance, The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft in December 2023, and several authors, including George R.R. Martin and John Grisham, have filed class-action suits. The Seattle Times and Newsday cases add to the mounting legal pressure on AI developers.

What sets these cases apart is the involvement of Microsoft, which has invested heavily in OpenAI and provides the computing infrastructure for ChatGPT. The lawsuits argue that Microsoft is not just a passive investor but an active participant in the development and deployment of AI models, making it liable for copyright infringement.

Potential Outcomes and Implications for AI Development

The outcomes of these lawsuits could have far-reaching consequences. If the courts rule against OpenAI and Microsoft, they may be required to pay damages and obtain licenses for the content used in training. This could lead to a licensing model where AI companies pay publishers for access to their archives, creating a new revenue stream for news organizations.

On the other hand, if the courts find that AI training falls under fair use, it could set a precedent that allows AI developers to continue using copyrighted material without compensation. This would likely escalate tensions and might prompt legislative action to clarify copyright law for the AI era.

For the journalism industry, these cases are about protecting the value of original reporting. If AI can freely use news articles, it could undercut the business model of news publishers, leading to a decline in quality journalism.

Guidance for Content Creators: Protecting Your Work

In light of these legal battles, content creators should take steps to protect their work from AI scraping. One approach is to use robots.txt files to block AI crawlers from accessing websites. OpenAI and other companies have provided instructions on how to opt out of training data, but compliance is not guaranteed.

Creators can also include clear copyright notices and terms of use on their websites that explicitly prohibit the use of content for AI training without permission. Additionally, they can monitor for unauthorized use of their content and consider legal action if necessary. Staying informed about developments in AI copyright law is crucial for making informed decisions.

Ready to shop?

We independently tested products related to this trend on Amazon.

See our Seattle Times and Newsday sue OpenAI and Microsoft for infringement buying guide

Frequently asked questions

They allege that OpenAI and Microsoft used their copyrighted articles without permission to train AI models like ChatGPT, constituting copyright infringement.

usonlinetrends publishes independent trend reports and buying guides. This article is editorial — not sponsored by brands mentioned.